Raw Fleece Contamination Measurement and Scouring Shrinkage Reconciliations
Reconciling raw wool purchases hinges on adjusting greasy weight against tested IWTO scoured clean wool yield and measured vegetable matter content.

Trash
Greasy fleece carries heavy loads of particulate sand, plant detritus, and dried bodily secretions. Raw clip weight measured at the farm gate or auction floor reflects a compound mass where clean keratin fiber often accounts for less than half the total volume. Particulate matter accumulates during grazing, settling deep into the staple structure near the skin.
Fine quartz sand, clay particles, and soil gravel enter the wool matrix through environmental exposure, creating abrasives that wear mechanical carding teeth and draft rollers during early stage processing. Sand loads settle quickly in wash liquor.
Vegetable matter contamination introduces distinct processing challenges that mechanical scouring alone cannot resolve. Seeds, burrs, twigs, and hard seed pods entangle within the crimp structure, adhering to the fleece through physical hook mechanisms or sticky grease residues. Spiral burrs like Xanthium and Medicago wrap around multiple staple fibers, resisting opening forces in opening machines and bowl agitation.
Unremoved plant material passes into the carding web, breaking sliver continuity or crushing into fine vegetal dust that compromises yarn appearance and dye uniformity.
| Contaminant Class | Typical Mass Fraction (%) | Primary Chemical Constituents | Scouring Removal Mechanism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral Dust | 5.0 – 20.0 | Silicon dioxide, aluminum silicates, iron oxides | Sedimentation in aqueous liquor bowls |
| Vegetable Matter | 1.0 – 10.0 | Cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin | Mechanical burr beating and carbonization |
| Suint Salts | 2.0 – 12.0 | Potassium salts, organic acids, peptides | Dissolution in warm aqueous immersion |
| Wool Wax | 5.0 – 25.0 | Cholesterol esters, lanolin fatty acids | Emulsification with surfactant at 65°C |
Accurate determination of non-wool mass requires representative sampling across high-density compressed bales. Hand-drawn samples fail because heavy mineral particles settle toward bale bases during transit, while vegetable matter concentrates around fleece skirts and backlines. Standardized core sampling protocols extract cylindrical plugs through the entire depth of the compressed wool mass, capturing a cross-sectional profile of all non-keratin impurities.
- Heavy Mineral Burdens increase transit costs and accelerate processing machinery wear when core testing fails to isolate deep soil penetration.
- Hard Seed Pods resist mechanical opening pin forces and require costly chemical carbonization using dilute sulfuric acid baths.
- Spiral Burr Fractions twist around individual staple crimps and force mills to run higher comb noil drop rates to maintain clean top specifications.
- Polypropylene Twine Fragments melt during high temperature drying cycles, creating un-dyeable synthetic specks across finished fabric lots.
Core sampling of greasy wool bales according to IWTO-19 yields a dry sample mass accuracy within a half percent tolerance when using twenty-two millimeter pressure coring tubes.
Ignoring vegetable matter distributions across raw lots leads directly to severe combed top yield losses and unexpected re-sorting costs at the carding machine.

Suint
Potassium salts of organic acids form the water-soluble fraction of raw fleece coating. This exudate from the suoriferous glands mixes with sebaceous wax secretions, forming a protective film over the growing staple. Suint consists primarily of potassium soaps, potassium carbonate, and small quantities of organic bases including urea and uric acid.
Fleece wax coats individual fiber shafts. Water dissolves suint salts easily. Grease content varies greatly across clips.
Extracting fleece components in laboratory settings demands precise solvent systems to isolate water-soluble salts from lipophilic waxes. Dichloromethane or ethanol extraction dissolves the fatty lipid layer, leaving water-soluble suint fraction behind for subsequent aqueous washing. Standardized extraction protocols measure solvent-extractable material gravimetrically following complete solvent evaporation under controlled vacuum heating.
- Bale core samples pass through a rotary laboratory opener to break dense locks without cutting individual keratin fibers.
- A sub-sample weighing precisely one hundred grams enters a Soxhlet extraction apparatus fitted with a reflux condenser.
- Dichloromethane solvent cycles through the wool mass for twenty flush repetitions, dissolving all lipid wax coatings.
- The solvent solution transfers to a tared flask, evaporating under nitrogen gas flow until a constant lipid weight remains.
- The extracted wool sample undergoes warm water washing at 60°C to dissolve water-soluble suint salts completely.
- Desiccated fiber masses cool in sealed containers before dry weight calculations establish final non-wool extractable percentages.
Chemical composition of suint influences the natural washability of the greasy fleece during industrial processing. High suint ratios act as natural detergents, lowering the surface tension of warm scouring water and assisting the emulsification of heavy wool wax deposits. Excessively alkaline suint compositions alter bowl pH levels, accelerating fiber swelling and increasing the risk of felting during mechanical bowl transport.
Water-soluble sweat salts function as natural emulsifying agents during early bowl immersion, reducing added surfactant consumption during commercial scouring cycles.
Suppliers frequently attribute lower scoured yield reports to unusually high natural suint secretion during wet grazing seasons rather than improper bale coring depth.

Shrinkage
Raw wool processing hinges on calculating the exact mass loss experienced when raw clip transforms into clean fiber. Scouring removes dirt, grease, suint, and moisture, leaving clean oven-dry keratin fiber along with residual vegetable matter. Shrinkage represents the percentage difference between the greasy mass delivered to the scour head and the clean dry fiber recovered at the dryer outlet.
Invoices reflect clean scoured yield. Moisture regains alter final mass.

What Moves Clean Wool Yield between Test Houses?
Discrepancies in reported clean yield between testing facilities arise from subtle variations in residual extraction methods, ash content burning temperatures, and regional standard moisture regain allowances. IWTO-19 mandates precise ash burning at 750°C to calculate residual mineral matter, yet slight furnace temperature drifts alter carbonate decomposition figures. Residual wax estimation methods also vary: some laboratories employ dichloromethane extraction, while others utilize alternative hydrocarbon solvents that extract different lipid fractions.
| Yield Terminology | Base Components Included | Standard Moisture Regain (%) | Commercial Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wool Base (WB) | Oven-dry clean wool keratin, zero ash, zero wax | 0.00 | Fundamental lab baseline calculation |
| Vegetable Matter Base (VMB) | Oven-dry vegetable matter, zero ash, zero wax | 0.00 | Plant contaminant mass baseline |
| IWTO Clean Wool Content (CWC) | Clean wool keratin plus official regain allowance | 17.00 | International raw wool trading standard |
| Schlumberger Dry Yield | Combed top yield allowance including processing waste | 18.25 | Topmaking and combing contract settlement |
Calculating the true commercial clean mass relies on adjusting clean dry keratin weight by the official regain percentage. The International Wool Textile Organisation sets standard wool regain at seventeen percent for greasy wool yield calculations, assuming a standard atmosphere of 65 percent relative humidity at 20°C. Converting laboratory Wool Base into commercial trade yield involves adding standard allowances for residual wax, residual ash, and standard moisture content.
Standard contracts executing under IWTO rules penalize yield deficiencies exceeding one half of one percent through direct credit adjustments on final landed invoices.
Yield calculations based on unconditioned mill floor masses always yield financial errors because wool fiber absorbs atmospheric water up to thirty percent of its dry mass without feeling damp to the touch.

Dispute
Discrepancies between certified core test yield and commercial scouring plant recovery create financial tension between buyers and vendors. Scouring plants process bulk clip lots through high-volume mechanical rake bowls, squeeze rollers, and dryer belts where physical fiber losses inevitably occur. Fly fiber carried out through exhaust air systems, short fiber lost in bowl liquor sludge, and unrecovered short wool drops reduce industrial yield below theoretical laboratory test figures.
Core samples yield precise measurements. Dirt loads settle quickly.
Commercial contracts resolve yield gaps through standardized arbitration testing rules. When a buyer challenges a certified IWTO test report, retesting must execute on retained core samples or newly drawn cores taken in the presence of representatives from both counter-parties. The retest procedure follows strict IWTO-31 protocols to eliminate sampling bias and laboratory instrument drift.
Core sampling procedures require strict adherence to spatial grids across compressed bale faces to prevent selective coring of high-yield fleece areas.
When retest results fall within the IWTO allowable limit of error, the original certificate stands and the challenging party pays all retesting fees. When the retest result falls outside allowable precision bands, the average of the original and retest figures establishes the binding commercial settlement weight.
- Sampling Pattern Bias occurs when coring technicians avoid dense bale straps, under-sampling outer edge vegetable matter concentrations.
- Moisture Gradient Shift develops when bales sit on damp warehouse floors, altering core sample mass before sealed container weighing.
- Ash Burning Variation results from inconsistent muffle furnace temperatures, changing mineral residual corrections in Wool Base formulas.
According to IWTO-31 clause 4.2, any yield arbitration claim must be lodged within forty-five days of certificate issuance and accompanied by unbroken sealed duplicate core samples taken at original testing.

Adjustment
Final financial settlement hinges on converting greasy bill of lading weights into clean scoured equivalents. Raw clip pricing quotes clean wool yield cents-per-kilogram figures, requiring buyers to apply certified laboratory yield test results to actual gross delivered weights. Invoices calculate clean weight by multiplying gross greasy mass by the certified IWTO Clean Wool Content percentage, adjusting for tare weights of packaging materials and steel strapping.
Scouring removes water-soluble sweat salts. Lab tests establish commercial yield. Yield losses drive lot pricing.

Worked Yield Reconciliation for Bulk Wool Shipments
Consider a commercial shipment of 100 compressed greasy wool bales purchased on an auction floor. The gross greasy mass measured at weighing is 19,500 kilograms, with a tare weight of 300 kilograms for packs and bands, yielding a net greasy mass of 19,200 kilograms. The lot carries an official IWTO test certificate declaring an IWTO Clean Wool Content of 62.50% and a Vegetable Matter Base of 1.80%.
| Parameter | Certified Test Value | Scour Plant Actual Value | Variance / Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Greasy Mass | 19,200 kg | 19,200 kg | 0 kg |
| Clean Content / Yield (%) | 62.50% (IWTO CWC) | 60.80% (Industrial Recovery) | -1.70% yield loss |
| Clean Equivalent Mass | 12,000 kg | 11,673.6 kg | -326.4 kg clean wool |
| Clean Contract Price ($/kg) | $12.50 / kg clean | $12.50 / kg clean | Base price fixed |
| Total Extended Value | $150,000.00 | $145,920.00 | -$4,080.00 shortfall |
The core certificate establishes the baseline invoice value at $150,000.00 based on 12,000 kilograms of certified clean wool content. If industrial scouring recovers only 11,673.6 kilograms of clean scoured fiber due to bowl liquor losses or underestimated heavy mineral dirt loads, a commercial yield claim arises. The contract formula reconciles this variance by applying the yield difference to the clean contract price, generating a debit note of $4,080.00 against the raw wool vendor.
Reconciling raw wool purchase ledger entries requires mapping gross auction weights directly against certified laboratory oven-dry clean yield figures.
Unresolved variations between oven-dry laboratory core test reports and commercial scour plant recovery weights leave open the operational question of whether processing fiber loss occurs through mechanical bowl waste or inaccurate initial core sample moisture determination.


